Monday, August 24, 2009

An interpretation based on objective reality

In the political science classes, we were taught that the aim,philosophy and direction of the Indian democracy are enshrined in the Preamble of the Constitution of India which is as follows:

WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC and to secure to all its citizens:

JUSTICE, social, economic and political;

LIBERTY of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship;

EQUALITY of status and of opportunity; and to promote among them all

FRATERNITY assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation;

But science teaches us not to blindly believe in whatever is being told by our ancestors or written in the holy books but to draw conclusions based on the objective conditions.The functioning of Indian democracy over a period of time is appearing to give the following meaning:

WE, THE CAPITALISTS and POLITICIANS OF INDIA, having conspired to constitute India into a HEGEMONIC CAPITALIST COMMUNAL DYNASTIC REPUBLIC and to secure to ourselves:

JUSTICE in the distribution of plunder;

LIBERTY of unbriddled exploitation of the labour of the people

EQUALITY of status and of opportunity to oppress; and to promote among ourselves

FRATERNITY assuring the opulence of each of us

and to force upon the People of India

INJUSTICE social, economic, political and ecological;

CURTAILMENT of thought, expression and human rights;

INEQUALITY of income, status, opportunity and potential;and to promote among them

HOSTILITY by exploiting the labour of individual and by dividing the people in the name of caste,religion,language and region.

2 comments:

Hari said...

Bhai,
Interesting. I guess the "content-Objective mapping" is enhanced to a hude complex deal to common man.

Just Like,try try until you (die)get it. Few 100 years later giraffe accomplished to have a longest neck. Our political system requires "reform" seekers for few generations to have a single amendment.

Anand Singh said...

Yes, but the frustration and anger generated out of the slow reform works constitute the strong material force which can pave the way for far reaching revolutionary changes if channelised properly.This is precisely the job of a revolutionary.